William Ruto’s supporters celebrate the supreme court’s decision in Nairobi on Monday
William Ruto’s supporters celebrate the supreme court’s decision in Nairobi on Monday © Reuters

Kenya’s supreme court has unanimously upheld the election of William Ruto as president, rejecting several petitions lodged by the losing candidate to have the result overturned.

The seven-member court found that losing candidate Raila Odinga’s alliance failed to prove claims that the polls had been rigged.

Chief Justice Martha Koome described some of the evidence presented to the court as variously “hot air”, “sensational”, “a wild-goose chase” and “not credible”.

Allegations of fraud had to be proved beyond reasonable doubt, she said, and evidence by the petitioners had been inconclusive.

The ruling, which cannot be appealed, offered further evidence of the court’s independence. Although Ruto, 55, was the incumbent vice-president, the government of outgoing president Uhuru Kenyatta had thrown its weight behind Odinga.

Kenya has a history of disputed and sometimes deadly elections, but this time the streets remained relatively calm. In 2017, the supreme court made history in Kenya, and in Africa, by nullifying the result of the election after declaring irregularities.

Last month, the chair of the electoral commission, Wafula Chebukati, said Ruto won 50.5 per cent of the vote, while former prime minister Odinga secured 48.8 per cent. But four out of seven electoral commissioners disowned the results, throwing Ruto’s victory into doubt.

In a petition filed last month, Odinga and his running mate, former magistrate Martha Karua, asked the Supreme Court to order a “nullification of the declaration of results”. Ruto had been declared the winner, the petition said, because of “irregularities and improprieties” that “were so substantial and significant and that they affected the result”.

Koome said that the court had found few discrepancies between the votes as declared at the polling stations and those collated at national levels, a central claim of Odinga’s petition. Nor had there been any evidence of voter suppression, she said, despite the unusually low turnout.

This was the fifth time Odinga, 77, has run for president and the third time he had challenged results in court. He had previously appealed to the supreme court after losing a disputed poll in 2013 when his nemesis-turned-ally, Kenyatta, took office. But that was rejected.

Ruto, who will be sworn in next week, on Monday thanked the people of Kenya for “trusting us with the leadership of our nation”.

The electoral commission said in a statement that the supreme court judgment “is a testimony that the commission conducted a free, fair, transparent and credible general election that met the democratic aspirations of the people of Kenya”, adding that the commission “is finally vindicated”.

In his response to the court judgment, Odinga said: “We have always stood for the rule of law and the constitution. In this regard, we respect the opinion of the court although we vehemently disagree with their decision today.”

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2024. All rights reserved.
Reuse this content (opens in new window) CommentsJump to comments section

Follow the topics in this article

Comments