How each country’s emissions and climate pledges compare
We’ll send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding up the latest COP27 news every morning.
The Financial Times has created a searchable dashboard of 193 countries’ historical emissions and future climate targets, as well as information on the energy mix that indicates their progress on renewable energy, using data from Climate Watch, the International Energy Agency and the UN.
The legally binding country targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are called nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and are recorded on the UN global registry.
Since the close of the UN COP26 climate summit in Glasgow in November 2021 where countries were asked to be more ambitious to meet the large gap in controlling emissions, just 33 countries out of almost 200 have submitted updated binding commitments to the UN.
Recent analysis by the UN Environment Programme described these targets collectively as being “woefully inadequate” and indicated “no credible pathway to 1.5C in place”, referring to the 2015 Paris Agreement goal to avoid potentially disastrous planetary changes for global warming.
Temperatures have already risen by at least 1.1C in the pre-industrial era. The Global Carbon Project says the world is on track for record emissions in 2022, that will drive temperatures higher still.
China, the world’s biggest annual emitter and heavily reliant on coal for power, last updated its target in October 2021, saying it would reach a “CO₂ emissions peak before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060”.
The US, the second-biggest emitter on an annual basis but the biggest historically, also failed to update its target in the past 12 months, submitting its latest commitment in April 2021. It has set an economy-wide target of cutting net greenhouse gas emissions by 50 to 52 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030.
However, it has passed flagship $369bn climate and tax legislation under the Biden administration that experts believe will help it get most of the way to its goal by stimulating green energy development.
The third biggest annual emitter, India, has more recently set a target. In August, it stated an intention to reduce its emissions intensity by 45 per cent by 2030 compared with 2005 levels. Emissions intensity is a goal that is criticised by experts because it allows for a rise in absolute emissions, as it measures emissions as a proportion of output.
The choice of different baseline years by country is another of the complexities in setting targets, making direct comparisons difficult. Baseline years often coincide with historical peaks in national emissions.
The less stringent measure of carbon intensity is also used by developing countries to design targets that allow for growth. It is calculated per unit of gross domestic product, to take into account the rise of emissions through economic expansion. China and India use carbon intensity.
In 2015, the year of the Paris accord, emissions from human activities were nearly 47bn metric tonnes of greenhouse gases, expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents. By 2020, this level was an estimated 52bn metric tonnes.
Follow @ftclimate on Instagram
Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.
Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here